I've trimmed some of the responses because it was turning into a book.
They're not stopping his actions, which is the point I'm making. So either they accept them or ignore them either way it isn't good. He may not officially represent the Stormcloaks, but in his mind he does. He's acting on their behalf in the streets like a thug, made worse by the fact he has an ex Stormcloak soldier with him.
Why should they stop him ? He's not doing anything wrong. The Stormcloaks probably see Rolff as being a loyal citizen of Windhelm cracking down on Imperial spies during crucial times.
What Rolff and his ex Stormcloak friend are doing is completely normal during time of war, and they have a legitimate concern about the Dunmers being an imperial spies, especially considering the fact that theirs an imperial legion officer uniform resting inside the second story of the Dunmers tavern. How can they explain the uniform without being affiliate with the Imperials?
He wasn't investigating until you came along. He gave you authority to do their job, as a Steward he'll always be in service to the Jarl and he is supposed to do official work. But he says "Nothing official" he's more used for war conversation than Hold duties.
Every hold runs differently and if you want to call him incompetent for not dealing with the 3 murders, then so be it, but you also must call the Steward from Solitude incompetent as well. In fact his incompetence almost risk the lives of an country, including putting the Empire at jeopardy.
“You mean the Dragon Bridge issue? I'll be honest with you, I was planning to let that go. Varnius is a bit jumpy at the best of times.”
http://cs.uesp.net/index.php?game=sr&formid=0x00026c4a
“There have been reports of weird happenings near Wolfskull Cave. Travelers disappearing, odd lights. I suspect wild animals or perhaps bandits. I don't think it's worth our time with the war going on, but if you want to clear out the cave, I'll make sure you're repaid for your work.”
http://cs.uesp.net/index.php?game=sr&formid=0x00026c49
“The cave has a bad history. Long ago, Potema the Wolf Queen used it for necromantic rituals. That's where it got the name. That was over 500 years ago. Nothing much down there now - but everyone's always convinced the cave is haunted.”
http://cs.uesp.net/index.php?game=sr&formid=0x0002c189
“Any resident of Solitude can tell you, she was the deadliest person ever to come out of Skyrim. Queen of Solitude, granddaughter of Emperor Uriel Septim II, five hundred years ago. Her fight for succession nearly tore the empire apart. After twenty years of fighting, she had raised armies of the dead, led by vampire generals. If she returns to power, nobody could stop her.”
http://cs.uesp.net/index.php?game=sr&formid=0x000284ef
Does that mean Ulfric is corrupt because Free-Winter has power? He's an Imperial supporter and undermines Ulfric on the streets. By your definition that makes Ulfric corrupt... No it doesn't work like that Raijin.
The Silver-Bloods are powerful because they own the mine and use thugs to extort the shop owners into paying them. How is it greedy to have a powerful clan in your Hold? Every Jarl must be corrupt because there are powerful citizens in the Holds...
There is nothing that even shows Igmund is corrupt. The Silver-Bloods also can't support Ulfric financially until they become Jarl. The Forsworn also control many routes, so logically the unaffected roads would be Imperial controlled.
You've completely lost me. What does the corruption of Igmund have to do with Free-Winter? What does he have to do with the corruption of Markarth? You've got me confused. What point are you trying to make by bringing an unrelated character involved in a Markarth related debate? I don't understand where you're coming from.
The fact to the matter is Imund is the most corrupted Jarl who allows the Silver-Bloods to do what they do because he gets showered with coin that comes from the mine that is suppose to be owned by the city, not by an individual.
Helgen was the 'fair trial'. They're being executed for high treason which is why you have Ralof going "Treason, for fighting for your own people!"
They don't believe they've committed treason, so in their mind "Fair trial" would be charged with something else. The only other example of High Treason in TES lore met with the exact same fate as the Stormcloaks were about to. Summary execution.
Ulfric would have known that, besides being a Jarl, he also served in the Imperial Legion. He'd understand the law.
Where do you get the notion that Helgen was considered a form of court? General Tullius didn't even let Ulfric speak, nor allowed him to summon the witnesses that he said he had. Tullius was determine to execute him without a fair trial. He was going to silent him so that the truth about the Empire can parish when Ulfric dies.
You call Tullius a warmonger, because what? The Legion stepped in to protect the thousands of citizens that want to remain part of the Empire?
Ulfric isn't snatching up minor offenders and putting them on the execution block. Yes I still stand by what I said about Tullius. He is and will always be a warmonger in my book, and from what I've gathered up in the game, And quit labeling the Legon as some hero who step in to save the day. Rthat's simply not true.