Elder Scrolls Skyrim Forum Fan Site

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Welcome to Skyrim Forums! Register now to participate using the 'Sign Up' button on the right. You may now register with your Facebook or Steam account!

Bloodline quest is the only time Dawnguard makes you actually choose

Been replaying Dawnguard and I think people miss why Harkon's ultimatum actually works. Like, the whole DLC is "pick a side" but it doesn't feel real until he corners you in Volkihar and basically says join or die. Everything before that you're just... doing quests. But that moment forces your hand in a way the Dawnguard ending doesn't, and I think that's intentional design that nobody credits.

The Dawnguard path is fundamentally reactive. Isran tells you what to do, you do it, you get the bow and the perks and you're done. It's fine! But Harkon actually makes you complicit. He's not asking you to help with his plan - he's telling you that you're already part of it because of what Serana is. The whole "you're my child now" angle is weird and uncomfortable (which I think is the point), but it means you can't just opt out and feel clean about it.

I'm not saying the vampire side is better written or anything. Just that mechanically and narratively, it's the only choice in Dawnguard that feels like an actual choice instead of just picking the questline you want to experience. The Dawnguard ending is "congrats you won," but Harkon's ending is "congrats you're complicit in something you might not have wanted."

Does anyone else feel like that moment is the peak of the whole DLC?
 
I get what you're saying about Harkon's ultimatum feeling more like a genuine fork in the road, but I think you're underselling how the Dawnguard path sets that up. Isran's definitely more straightforward, yeah, but the whole arc of learning what Serana is - what her blood means, what Harkon wants from her - that's the actual choice. By the time you're in Volkihar, you've already decided whether you're protecting her or handing her over. Harkon's "join or die" is just making explicit what you committed to three quests ago.

The thing that gets me is that the vampire side kind of relies on you not thinking too hard about what you're actually doing. Like, yeah, you're "complicit," but complicit in what exactly? Harkon's plan is basically "use my daughter to blot out the sun so we can hunt humans forever." The game doesn't really make you roleplay that outcome or grapple with it - you just get the perks and the ending cutscene. If anything, the Dawnguard path forces more of a choice because you have to actively choose to not help stop an apocalypse scenario.

That said, you're right that the framing matters. Harkon making it personal through Serana is way more effective than Isran's "here's your orders, soldier" approach. But I'd argue that's a writing win for the vampire questline, not a mechanical one - you're still just picking the faction and doing their quests like any other DLC content.
 
Back
Top