I just found this thread actually via google. Just checking out "skyrim paladin" basically. I just wanted to say -
I do agree with a whole lot of this build, and I think it's great. However, the racism/ehtnocentricities against certain species of the game - Argonians, Nords, Khajiit, doesn't seem fair. It seems more stereotyping to the "norm" rather than having a species that still has "lawful good" characters. Just because there is a stereotype doesn't necessarily mean that species or race as a whole is evil or bad.
Also, about the Companions, and their Circle of Werewolves in general. What makes one evil? If there is a lawful-good character that happens to be associated with the Great Hunt, and is a werewolf does that necessarily make that person now unlawful, or evil? When my character transforms into a werewolf, I still have complete control over him as a character. Why would he be "evil" even when he doesn't perform unlawful, let alone evil acts? Just because everyone in their right mind are scared of werewolves because of feral ones giving them a bad name, doesn't mean my werewolf is necessarily evil.
And technically, to the mythological sense, is a Companion Werewolf truly a "werewolf" then? I consider them more shapeshifters. The moon has zero control over my character. It's his choice when to change, and when to not, and again, like I said previously - he has full control of his actions.
My paladins, are Companions, moreover they are Harbinger. They both have the alignment lawful-good, both are Nords, both are
dovakiin as well. One fights for the Empire, one fights for the Stormcloaks and a sovereign Skyrim. That's their only real difference.
I also feel it's a Paladin's duty to serve, with the side they feel is just - be it Imperial or Stormcloak in the Civil War. Just with almost any Civil War, what makes a side just or unjust? It's their personal beliefs that dictate it.
as for weapon-types. It depends on if one follows the strict rules of D&D. I don't. This isn't D&D, it's Elder Scrolls. One of my Nord Paladins is a two-handed great weapons fighter, the other is more "traditional" axe and shield, but it's an axe, not a mace.

Axes seem more "Nord."
I believe it's the
lawful good that's more important than anything. Race, "special talents" etc, matter little.
this is the only reason why I selected "disagree" with the first post by "Spectre of Skyrim" but I did hit "like" as well. Beyond that though, I think it's great there is a thread discussing Paladins, and I hope my addition will help spur the conversation again.