Docta Corvina
Well-Known Member
I did so because unlike you, my agenda in this thread is to refute false claims about the lore that players have tried to assert in an effort to support their advocacy for joining either side. The fact that I do it far more often regarding posts from those that advocate for the Stormcloaks is only evidence of the significantly higher prevalence of posts by those players that mistakenly or intentionally (and quite often in your case delusionally) attempt to distort or make outright false claims about the lore of the Elder Scrolls Universe in a misguided attempt to support their arguments.
THIS. This is what drives me most often to jump back in here and say something in response, even after I've sworn to myself not to do so in the interests of saving my sanity. It bothers me when I see blatantly false claims or misinformation being used to "back up" stances. Of course I'm all for having a "side" that you unwaveringly support, whatever side of it all it happens to be. Skyrim was my first ES game ever and all of my decisions and opinions about the CW and its components obviously originated in what I saw while playing initially, but I've since made an effort to engage the lore and history (that which is largely available online), as well as play previous games for added perspective. Maybe it's just my debater's spirit, but one thing I cannot stand is outright fabrications, ignoring of established lore and refusal to acknowledge facts when presented. It's exceedingly difficult to have a real conversation about the game's events and what perhaps motivates them when either side is merely throwing out hyperbolic statements with little or no grounding in reality. If anything, it forces us to all come full circle an infinite number of times here - evident from page one, onward lol. I enjoy debating and will continue to visit this thread. But it's certainly problematic at times.