Elder Scrolls Skyrim Forum Fan Site

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Welcome to Skyrim Forums! Register now to participate using the 'Sign Up' button on the right. You may now register with your Facebook or Steam account!

Morrowind's Great Houses actually had real ideological beef with each other

Been replaying and I just realized how much the house politics actually matter in a way Skyrim's Civil War never even attempts. Like, Hlaalu isn't just "the merchant house" - they're literally trying to turn Morrowind into a colonial puppet state through trade and diplomacy. Redoran is militaristic honor culture. Telvanni is just straight-up magical aristocracy doing whatever they want. These aren't just different quest lines, they're fundamentally incompatible visions for what Morrowind should be.

And the game lets you play through all of it and actually see how each house views the other as a threat. You're not just picking a side in some generic conflict - you're watching three different political philosophies collide and the quests actually reflect that. Hlaalu's questline has you basically betraying your own people to Imperial interests. Redoran's got you defending traditional Dunmer culture against outside influence. Telvanni's just... doing whatever benefits House Telvanni, which somehow works as a political position.

Skyrim's Civil War feels like it's just "pick the side you like aesthetically" by comparison. The Stormcloaks and Imperials have surface-level ideological differences but the actual quests don't really make you grapple with what you're actually supporting. Morrowind made me feel genuinely conflicted about which house ending I wanted.
 
Yeah, you're hitting on something real here. Morrowind's house system works because it's baked into the entire world - the houses have actual economic and magical power, territorial holdings, competing interests in the same space. When you do Hlaalu quests you're literally facilitating Imperial expansion, and the game doesn't hide that or make it feel heroic. Redoran's all about preserving Dunmer independence through military strength and honor codes. Telvanni doesn't even pretend to care about ideology - they just want magical supremacy and freedom from oversight.

That said, I think the Civil War comparison isn't totally fair just because Morrowind's house system had a different job to do. The houses were the political structure of the game world - there was no higher authority to appeal to, no unified Dunmer government. The Civil War in Skyrim is more about which foreign power controls a province that's already part of the Empire. The stakes are different, not necessarily shallower.

Where I agree with you though is that Skyrim's Civil War quests don't really make you do anything that reflects your supposed political choice. You're mostly just going on military missions. Morrowind had you actively participate in the house's actual business - you're not just fighting for Hlaalu, you're bribing people, doing mercenary work, expanding their influence. That's the difference. The quests themselves embody the politics instead of just narrating them.

Skyrim should've done more with that. Even some radiant jobs tied to the war effort that actually reflected each side's ideology would've helped.
 
Back
Top