Elder Scrolls Skyrim Forum Fan Site

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Welcome to Skyrim Forums! Register now to participate using the 'Sign Up' button on the right. You may now register with your Facebook or Steam account!

Was this choice good or was it evil.

Yea they are in the future now or past or wherever they go to lol. I wanted to lose them in a chest lol, I didnt want them I wanted them gone to the void or wherever the chests take em haha.
 
I didn't mean to slap it on all, I was just referring to Mehrunes Dagon, because that's the Prince we are dealing with. I was responding to somebodies post because they referred Dagon as Daedric Prince, I was just continuing on with the pattern.

Ah, but you just said:

His Act is to do the bidding of a Daedric Prince, which is of course considered bad.

This implies that simply the status of being a daedric prince is inherently evil (you racist :p).

It wasn't just you that was aimed at though. Psiberzerker made the same equivocation. Indefinite articles shouldn't be used when talking about specific entities, eh?

Yea they are in the future now or past or wherever they go to lol. I wanted to lose them in a chest lol, I didnt want them I wanted them gone to the void or wherever the chests take em haha.

You thought they just ceased to exist? Nay, friend. Those chests are looted and reused by an enterprising adventurer, much like yourself. You unleashed all those other items back on the world.
 
Ah, but you just said


This implies that simply the status of being a daedric prince is inherently evil (you racist :p).

It wasn't just you that was aimed at though. Psiberzerker made the same equivocation. Indefinite articles shouldn't be used when talking about specific entities, eh?

I know, I was not trying to make that implication. My wording was wrong, and I admit to that.
 
Ah, but you just said:



This implies that simply the status of being a daedric prince is inherently evil (you racist :p).

It wasn't just you that was aimed at though. Psiberzerker made the same equivocation. Indefinite articles shouldn't be used when talking about specific entities, eh?



You thought they just ceased to exist? Nay, friend. Those chests are looted and reused by an enterprising adventurer, much like yourself. You unleashed all those other items back on the world.

good thing I have got them in a safer location. (wipes sweat from brow)
 
The thing is though, no matter where you store them, they can technically be found. If you're able to get to the location, so can another adventurer. ;)

Ure getting me worried now why cant u just tell me yea evrything will be fine;). hey I have an idea for for new DLC a huge mountain that is a volcano and it can destroy any item like an enchanted ring or a dagger (high five im so original) lol:p
 
Lol. Like I said earlier, ultimately you can rationalize this situation however you like- it's your game, and you should play in a way that you enjoy. You could always hit the chest you store the artifacts in with some Destruction magic (like Flames) and RP that you destroyed them that way. Though I do agree with a lot of the opinions that you will need to find a way to "repent" somehow.
 
Lol. Like I said earlier, ultimately you can rationalize this situation however you like- it's your game, and you should play in a way that you enjoy. You could always hit the chest you store the artifacts in with some Destruction magic (like Flames) and RP that you destroyed them that way. Though I do agree with a lot of the opinions that you will need to find a way to "repent" somehow.

Hmmm intresting btw if my character Edvard Snowmane commits suicide I want you to know its because u messed with his concious. lmao:D
 
Hmmm intresting btw if my character Edvard Snowmane commits suicide I want you to know its because u messed with his concious. lmao:D

A "Good" Jesus build wouldn't commit suicide sir, suicide is inherently selfish and cowardly. You just can't win! ;)

I hope you don't take me too seriously. I am just teasing you, and playing devil's advocate.
 
A "Good" Jesus build wouldn't commit suicide sir, suicide is inherently selfish and cowardly. You just can't win! ;)

I hope you don't take me too seriously. I am just teasing you, and playing devil's advocate.

Yea I know its an ultimate sin, nah he could never commit suicide, to many Thalmor to kill:p Yea I know ure just playing haha I love the banter on this forum;)
 
The Circumstance is the particulars of what you have to do to complete the quest, and who you're doing it for. Not because he's a Daerdric Prince, but because he's the Daedric Prince of Ambition, Destruction, and Upheaval, among other things. The only way to get it is to betray Silus as Ordered by Mehrunes, and put the pieces back together when they where shattered to rid the world of an inherently instrument fo Death, and Destruction designed to wreak havok on Tamriel. This isn't personal morality, here, we're talking High Fantasy Good-Evil. No gray in between. You destroy stuff likeat, not put it back together and assume it's safe because you pitched it in the water. Someone found all the peices, and broughtthem back, so obviously, it's just as easier for someone, subtly led by a Daedric Prince who wants to see it working in the world again to find it.

It doesn't get any more clear cut that that. The ends don't justify the means when in the End you took an artifacte that was rendered inert, and made it dangerous again. Mehrunes wins again. I'm beginning to think you don't understand Evil very well, either.
 
The Circumstance is the particulars of what you have to do to complete the quest, and who you're doing it for. Not because he's a Daerdric Prince, but because he's the Daedric Prince of Ambition, Destruction, and Upheaval, among other things. The only way to get it is to betray Silus as Ordered by Mehrunes, and put the pieces back together when they where shattered to rid the world of an inherently instrument fo Death, and Destruction designed to wreak havok on Tamriel. This isn't personal morality, here, we're talking High Fantasy Good-Evil. No gray in between. You destroy stuff likeat, not put it back together and assume it's safe because you pitched it in the water. Someone found all the peices, and broughtthem back, so obviously, it's just as easier for someone, subtly led by a Daedric Prince who wants to see it working in the world again to find it.

It doesn't get any more clear cut that that. The ends don't justify the means when in the End you took an artifacte that was rendered inert, and made it dangerous again. Mehrunes wins again. I'm beginning to think you don't understand Evil very well, either.

Well in my characters mind if I didn't go get the peices for Silus he would have got someone else to do it, killing that maniac Silus was a plus considering I am a devout Talos worshiper, I am justified in killing Silus by this, his ancestors killed my god's last remaining Septims (Uriel and his sons). his family was the reason the Septims got wiped out, now I am not saying that is reason enough to kill Silus, but this is, he friken opens a museum of the Mythic Dawn, I am suprised I got to him before the Empire did, they wouldn't have let him off so lightly as I did, such is my mercy that I ended him quickly, I dont think he deserves to be tortured by the Imperials. If I didn't put the razor back together someone else would, as u have stated in an earlyer post the damb razor keeps turning up in history.
 
We're just going to gloss over the human sacrifice to this guy?
Mehrunes_Dagon1.jpg

Eh, he probably deserved it.

I can sum up Talos' lines in this game in 1 Quote: "..." ~Tiber Septim. We both know who COMANDed you to kill him, and you did it. End of story.
 
Everyone, please keep in mind that even The most brutal princes have their moments. Dagon is the prince of destruction, revolution and ambition. Not only is creation impossible without the destruction of what came before, but all of these aspects are the domain of the series heroes. Indeed, both Ulfric and Tullius show these traits. Also, the destruction of Nirn to create a new world was Alduin's original purpose, given to him by the Dvines themselves. Even Molag Bal, compared to Satan, releases you from his trap. He could just let the Dovahkiin starve in that cage and reap his soul in Oblivion, but if you complain, he releases you (with much contempt) and makes it clear that his offer still stands.
My case is, don't be hatin their Daedric swagga!
 
Everyone, please keep in mind that even The most brutal princes have their moments. Dagon is the prince of destruction, revolution and ambition. Not only is creation impossible without the destruction of what came before, but all of these aspects are the domain of the series heroes. Indeed, both Ulfric and Tullius show these traits. Also, the destruction of Nirn to create a new world was Alduin's original purpose, given to him by the Dvines themselves. Even Molag Bal, compared to Satan, releases you from his trap. He could kill the Dovahkiin in an instant in that cage and reap his soul in Oblivion, but f you complain, he releases you (with much contempt) and makes it clear that his offer still stands.
My case is, don't hate their Daedric swagga!
WHo's hatin'? I revel in it, just don't try to tell me it's Talos' will. Sure, he can lay down Wrath with a Vengance, but he sure don't make pacts with Mehrunes Dagon for Daedra Hearts, and lots of XP, then try to tell you it was for the greater good.
 
We're just going to gloss over the human sacrifice to this guy?
Mehrunes_Dagon1.jpg

Eh, he probably deserved it.

I can sum up Talos' lines in this game in 1 Quote: "..." ~Tiber Septim. We both know who COMANDed you to kill him, and you did it. End of story.

I needed the razor first before i could kill him, as to keep it safe.
 
We're just going to gloss over the human sacrifice to this guy?
Mehrunes_Dagon1.jpg

Eh, he probably deserved it.

I can sum up Talos' lines in this game in 1 Quote: "..." ~Tiber Septim. We both know who COMANDed you to kill him, and you did it. End of story.
 
It's a lot safer in one peice than shattered, and scattered with monsters in front of it? I still fail to see that logic.

I dont have the manpower to watch over 3 locations (was it 3 or 4), I made a choice, let it stay in parts or have it peiced together and protect it with higher security, protecting one peice in one location is much easyer than protecting a few peices in diffrent locations. for example

3 peices in diffrent locations
1 location 33% security
2 location 33% security
3 location 33% security

1 peice in one location
1 location 100% security

(I know there is a percent missing from above)
 
Back
Top